A Comparative Study of Different Quality Management System Implementation in Automotive Suppliers

In general, the purpose of this study is to analyze the different between Quality Management System (QMS) which are implemented in Automotive Suppliers (Proton). There are three difference system of QMS were practice by Automotive Suppliers, it is IS09000:2000, QS9000 and TS16949. There are three purposes in these studies. 1st, analyze which QMS more suitable to be implementing to automotive supplier. Second, determine the differences in each three system. Third, determine methods of implementation of QMS which are practiced at supplier in order to produce quality product. In this study, the author to analyzed in five categories and first are differences of clauses in three difference QMS. Second, to prepared question form related with implementation of QMS at suppliers. Third, studied the implementation of the document's procedure for each automotive supplier. Forth, to determined the control method in management and operation with combination of QMS, management process and efficiency measurement. Firth, to determine benefits found after implement the QMS. There are fiv1 things found in these studies. First, proven that in each three QMS found differences in clauses. Second, found that the TS 16949 is the most suitable system practiced in automotive industries. Third, found that similarity in documented procedure used at suppliers. Fourth, there are benefits to supplier, when they use QMS in their company. Fourth, found that overall suppliers used Key Performance Indicator (KP1) to control their organization, management and operation. From the study, the author was proposed two things have to develop. First, to construct flow chart for each documents procedure were use at suppliers. Seconds, to construct combination model, between QMS and KPL.